Whatever else you might say about him and whether you disagree with him or not the man truly knew how to layout an argument. Mr. Lewis' arguments are thorough, logical, no nonsense and somehow manage to include any critical tangents without losing sight of the main track.
I've been reading a few compilations of his papers and essays recently (some fascinating stuff if you've yet to read, I'm particularly found of the On Stories compilation) One of the things that struck me from reading these is that he often re-used arguments/argument proofs. At first I found this rather annoying and frankly felt a bit jipped, desiring something new. After actually thinking about this instead of simply reacting I realized my error. Of course the same argument/argument proof can, and possibly even should, be used on multiple occasions when addressing relevant issues. These papers were written for different events, different audiences and at different times over the years. Furthermore, if the argument/proof/illustration has never been successfully disproved or found wanting in anyway why should one be expected to come up with a new one?
That brings me to another thing I really admire about Mr. Lewis. He was intelligent and well educated and reading his work requires thought. It typically forces you to engage your brain or go elsewhere.
I've been reading a few compilations of his papers and essays recently (some fascinating stuff if you've yet to read, I'm particularly found of the On Stories compilation) One of the things that struck me from reading these is that he often re-used arguments/argument proofs. At first I found this rather annoying and frankly felt a bit jipped, desiring something new. After actually thinking about this instead of simply reacting I realized my error. Of course the same argument/argument proof can, and possibly even should, be used on multiple occasions when addressing relevant issues. These papers were written for different events, different audiences and at different times over the years. Furthermore, if the argument/proof/illustration has never been successfully disproved or found wanting in anyway why should one be expected to come up with a new one?
That brings me to another thing I really admire about Mr. Lewis. He was intelligent and well educated and reading his work requires thought. It typically forces you to engage your brain or go elsewhere.


The cutest of the cute, these baby ducks are often spotted in the spring following closely behind their mother. As a duckling you will grow up quickly, becoming one of the adult ducks seen commonly in ponds and streams. Playful and timid, charming and vulnerable, ducklings are nature's very definition of innocence.